Feb 13, 2019
# Max Speed and Torque

For this update, let’s discuss the performance of stepper motors and specifically the torque/speed curve. It can be a complex subject, but we’ll try to simplify it as best we can. Just remember the big take-away is that **torque is proportional to current through the motor coils**. Torque is derived from the magnetic field in the motor coils, and the strength of the magnetic field is proportional to the current flowing through it.

We’ll use this principle to see how stepper motors behave at different speeds. To set a speed, we drive the current through the coils at a specific frequency (in a sine wave fashion). The higher the frequency, the faster the speed. In a perfect world, we could go as fast as we like. However, as we will soon see, there are limiting factors that attenuate the current at higher frequencies. When the current drops too low, the motor won’t spin.

Ohm’s law plays a huge role here. Current is voltage divided by resistance (*I = V/R*). Since we know that *V* is the input voltage (and a constant), to know the maximum current through the coils (*I*), we have to know how the resistance (*R*) changes at higher frequencies.

**Using an LCR (left), we can measure inductance and resistance.**

*A. NEMA 11 B. NEMA 17 C. NEMA 23 D. NEMA 34 E. NEMA 34 High Torque*

Using an LCR meter, we can measure resistance and inductance of the motor’s phase coils at varying frequencies. This works by injecting a signal (and energizing the coil) and measuring the response. Note here that we can’t reach stellar accuracy because the motor isn’t a true inductor. When we energize the coils, the shaft moves and adds noise to the measurements. What’s important here is the trend.

Measurements were taken on the five motors shown above at different frequencies. Plotted below are the measured inductance (in millihenries) and resistance *ESR* (measured in Ohms) with respect to frequency. We’re using 1.8 degree stepper motors (by far the most common) and the equivalent RPMS are annotated by the vertical lines. Note that the maximum speed the Wi-Fi Stepper is capable of is 4500 RPM.

*Graph of frequency vs inductance and ESR of five motors in Log-Log form.*

What’s really interesting in this graph is that it shows that the higher the frequency, the higher the *ESR*. Every stepper motor has a point at which the current at higher frequencies is limited by this *ESR*. It’s physically impossible to drive the motor at the desired current above this point. As such, torque is limited too (since torque is proportional to current). This point is known as the **corner frequency**.

Below the corner frequency, current is limited by the stepper motor driver and your KTval setting. Above it, the *ESR* takes over and limits the current according to Ohms law *V/R* (the *R* here being the *ESR*). An interesting aspect of this is that higher input voltages raise the corner frequency, and higher *KTvals* actually *lower* the corner frequency.

*Current vs Frequency graph*

Why does the *ESR* increase with frequency? Eddy currents in the motor windings, as well as proximity and skin effect all play their roles.

Most stepper motors have datasheets that show a similar graph as the one above. It will list torque rather than current and also have a rated voltage and peak current.

Finally, let’s actually show the *ESR* in action. In the first oscilloscope plot, we’ve hooked up the NEMA 23 to the Wi-Fi Stepper and set our *KTval* to 3 Amps. Running at 30 RPM, we are well in the constant current region of the current/frequency curve. This is where the stepper motor driver is limiting the current to 3 Amps using the current sense resistor feedback. In the next plot, we are running at 4500 RPM, our maximum speed. At this speed, our *ESR* is at maximum and our current is limited to one fifth of our desired 3 Amps.

*Running at 30 RPM in the constant current region*

*Running at 4500 RPM, the current is limited by the ESR*